When I ran for the Ypsilanti School Board, I was forced to deal with my share of negative campaigning and the spreading of misinformation about who I was and what I stood for. Unfortunately, now that the current election season is in full swing, I am seeing the same thing happen, only this time with the mayoral race. I think this type of negativity is uncalled for, and I have little patience for those who engage in it.
Last week I received a letter from the Ypsilanti Campaign for Equality (YCFE), an organization that I donated a great deal of my own personal time and effort to. Apparently, two of it's co-chairs decided on their own to endorse one mayoral candidate, and then decided that their endorsement would be more effective if it were issued under the auspices of the organization. Then they went further than a mere endorsement. They deliberately misled members of the organization by stating that another candidate was not a supporter of the YCFE.
I object to this type of campaigning and to the intentional spreading of misleading information for political purposes. Following is my open letter to our community:
As a strong supporter of the Ypsilanti Campaign for Equality, I was dismayed by a mailing issued by two of the organization's co-chairs that endorsed one mayoral candidate and spread misleading information about another.
Steve Pierce was and is a strong supporter of the YCFE. In fact, the YCFE's web presence was due to his generous donation of Internet hosting. He also proudly displayed a lawn sign and was openly supportive of our cause.
I am also concerned that the endorsement did not involve any attempt to poll supporters of the YCFE or speak with the candidates prior to issuing it. It was poor form for one of the co-chairs to issue the endorsement while failing to mention that she is closely connected with the endorsee's campaign committee, a key fact that should have been disclosed.
The YCFE has been a powerful force in Ypsilanti as a defender of civil rights and as an organization that has brought our community together, making it stronger. Its strength and credibility flow from the generosity and hard work displayed by its supporters and contributors. I object to its co-chairs' use of the organization's name, its letterhead, and its goodwill as a soapbox to express their own personal political opinions. I think supporters of the YCFE deserve better, as do the citizens of Ypsilanti.
Our city faces tough fiscal times. This election is an outstanding opportunity to achieve a truly progressive change in city leadership. I urge supporters of the YCFE to learn more about Steve Pierce, about his actual and real support of our cause, and to consider his candidacy for the mayoral race based upon the facts and his record. When this election is over, I want to be able to stand behind whoever wins knowing that the winner was elected legitimately on the basis of an accurate evaluation by voters. When facing our city's challenges, I believe we really are all in this together, and we must maintain our ability to work together constructively and productively after the election is finished.
We are quite lucky this year to be in a position where nobody can question the candidates' commitment and heartfelt dedication to our city. In the fervor to support the various candidates, I hope we don't squander the achievements and progress that have brought us so far as a community. |
Comments on "Political dirty tricks on the eve of ElvisFest"
-
maryd said ... (1:27 PM) :
-
Kate said ... (2:23 PM) :
-
trusty getto said ... (2:46 PM) :
-
Kate said ... (9:03 PM) :
-
maryd said ... (10:07 PM) :
-
maryd said ... (10:09 PM) :
-
trusty getto said ... (10:47 PM) :
-
Rod said ... (12:40 AM) :
-
Jeremy said ... (10:07 AM) :
post a commentHere, here!
Okay, I have questions: You say the two co-chairs decided to send this letter out on their own. Did they not poll some kind of executive board or the membership or whatever to get a sense of whether or not they were speaking for everyone?
Is the YCFE a PAC? If so, don't they have to abide by some rules as to who speaks for the committee? And whether or not the information they disseminate is accurate?
Who pays for the mailing?
I agree with everything you said, especially about working together after the election. No matter who is at the head, it's still OUR town.
Kate, I've spoken with a number of fellow YCFE supporters. Nobody I've spoken to was contacted prior to the endorsement, and I'm not aware that there is a formal executive board. The campaign filings don't show one.
Paul's campaign paid for the mailing.
It's purpose in the County Campaign Database was listed as "Opposing change to Ypsi charter for human rights." Here's the link to the creation filing:
http://campaign.ewashtenaw.org/PDF/B-2001-0050002.pdf
While on the site, I also noted that the YCFE was dissolved with two filings in January and February of 2004. Here are links to the dissolution papers:
http://campaign.ewashtenaw.org/PDF/B-2001-0050015.pdf
http://campaign.ewashtenaw.org/PDF/B-2001-0050016.pdf
I only know the rules applicable to candidates, not to PAC's or ballot initiative committees, so I can't really respond to your other question.
This is niggling in my mind, so let me throw it out there: Aren't these the same women who brought the gay issue into the school board elections a few years ago? And I'm not talking Tom Reiber, here, because you and I both know about that one, Cam.
But, I'm thinking something was said by these two in the same election where the postcard was sent around with spurious allegations about Floyd Brumfield. I think the postcard overshadowed this other, but I seem to recall YCFE leadership saying something about Andy Fanta, or Floyd, or maybe Andy AND Floyd being anti-gay, but then having to retract that.
I don't remember what happened, exactly, but somehow they screwed up the information and had really said some nasty things that weren't true. I'm pretty sure it was Bath Bashert and Lisa Zuber who did it, too, because I remember thinking Lisa was going to get John in trouble, politically, if she kept that up.
Does anyone else remember that better than I do?
I remember. It is strangley familiar.
I meant "strangely" :/
Kate: There was a controversy created by the same YCFE leaders when a less than thorough review of their records reflected that Fanta was anti-YCFE (which he was not).
Only after I and apparently Paul Schreiber both contacted Fanta and got the real story did they concede that their intepretation was in error.
What strikes me as odd about that situation was that the people doing the judging and issuing the opinion didn't get in touch with the person who they were judging at the time, just as is the case now.
Nasty business Cameron,
though really, this is how politics is really played despite assurances of clean and positive campaigns.
Wasn't it Lincoln who said "any man can show great courage in adversity, however to gain the true measure of a man's character, give him power" or words to that effect?
Paul doesn't have power yet, but the "prenuptial jitters" are not looking promising from him
Take Care
Rod
As the President of a 501c3 non-profit organization that deals with LGBT issues in Washtenaw County, I am EXTREMELY disappointed that people who have worked in multiple non-profit organizations would misuse information that they were charged with. This is disgusting, unethical and a violation of the public's trust. I will be looking into whether Paul Schreiber knows what is happening or not...